|
Final Words:
• The SAR
mechanism is initialed
in a department.
• Program
team is formed and their
training is conducted
• Fortnightly meetings arc arranged
with program team to review
progress.
• When SAR is submitted,
initial
review is done by QEC and
then the report is
sent to Assessment Team
• Assessment Team gives
its
findings and a rectification
plan
is prepared.
Different Tables that may be used
during
SAR preparation:
|
Objectives |
How Measured |
When
Measured |
Improvement identified (based on
the outcomes examination) |
Improvements Made |
|
1 |
Appendix C |
|
|
|
|
2 |
-do- |
|
|
|
|
3 |
-do- |
|
|
|
|
4 |
-do- |
|
|
|
|
5 |
-do- |
|
|
|
Table 4.1 Program objectives Assessment
|
Program
Objectives
|
Expected
Learning Outcomes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
Table 4.2 Outcomes various objectives
|
Semester
|
Course # |
Category
(Credit Hours) |
|
Maths &
Basic Sciences |
Core
Courses |
Humanities & Social Sciences |
Technical Electives |
|
Maths |
Basic
Sci |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4.3 Curriculum Course requirements
|
Courses
or Group of Courses |
Program
Outcomes |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
Table 4.4 Courses verses program outcomes
|
AT
findings |
Corrective Action |
Implementation Date |
Responsible Body |
Resources Needed |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman’s Comments
Name &
Signature |
|
Dean’s
Comments
Name &
Signature |
|
QEC
Comments
Name &
Signature |
Table A.2 Assessment Results Implementation Plan
Summary
|
